Guide to Obtaining Specimens at Post-mortem for Analytical Toxicology

Copyright © [Regional Laboratory for Toxicology]. All rights reserved.

1. INTRODUCTION

These guidelines have been written in order to assist Pathologists in the selection of appropriate specimens of body fluids and tissues for post mortem biochemical and toxicological analysis to be carried out at the Regional Laboratory for Toxicology. More detailed guidelines for pathologists have been published elsewhere (Forrest 1993; Knight, 1996). It is particularly important to obtain samples from the anatomical sites stated in the following guidelines. This will assist in the interpretation of the results by reducing the problems caused by post mortem drug distribution.

In addition to indicating the exact site of specimen collection, it is also important to provide any relevant available details regarding the medical and drug history of the deceased as well as the circumstances of the death. The Request for Post Mortem Toxicology Investigation form should be completed in full (see Documentation).

Following death there can be rapid changes in cellular biochemistry as autolysis proceeds, and drugs and other poisons may be released from their binding sites in tissues and major organs, also unabsorbed drug may diffuse from the stomach. Special care should always be taken in the selection of blood and tissue sampling site(s), the method of collection of samples, and the labelling of sample containers. There is substantial published evidence to show that for most drugs and poisons, including alcohol, there are important differences in their concentration in blood according to the time of specimen collection after death, choice of sampling site, method of sampling and volume of blood collected (Pounder and Jones 1990; Pounder 1993). It is common to observe tenfold differences in the concentration of certain drugs and some chemical poisons in post-mortem blood taken from different sites. Specimens taken from "central" sites e.g. heart tend to give particularly "high" values for most analytes. Moreover, certain commonly used "peripheral" sites such as subclavian, may sometimes give results closer to "central" sites such as the heart. The most consistent quantitative findings are obtained in blood taken from the femoral vein, which is the recommended site of specimen collection. It is also possible to observe differences in the concentration of certain drugs obtained from different tissue sampling sites for liver and lung.

2. COLLECTION OF URINE AND BLOOD SAMPLES

The standard procedure for toxicological analysis performed at this laboratory requires the collection of blood and urine samples. Appropriate tissue (brain, liver etc.) and stomach contents should be collected at post mortem but will not normally be required by this laboratory unless special investigations are required; however they should be retained at the mortuary. It is preferable to send specimens to the Laboratory via the Coroner's Officer or via a reputable Courier service. This is particularly important in certain medico-legal cases where, in order to maintain the chain of custody, specimens should be submitted in person to the Laboratory by the authorised Coroner's Officer. However, if this is not possible, most specimens, particularly blood and urine, may be sent by post if tightly sealed in their respective containers and securely packaged.

3. SUPPLY OF SPECIMEN CONTAINERS

Depending upon stock availability the Laboratory is able to provide appropriate specimen containers for the collection of blood and urine specimens at post mortem, where cases are submitted to this Laboratory for investigation. Please contact the Laboratory if this service is required. In general, use containers appropriate to the specimen volumes with secure closures. Plastic universal (20 mL) containers are usually sufficient in addition to 5 mL fluoridated glass containers.

NEW POSTAL REGULATIONS

From 1st January 2007 the Royal Mail introduced new regulations for sending biological specimen through the post. At the moment we have been informed that these guidelines are for infectious samples and do not apply to specimens for diagnostic assays such as toxicology screening. However, as many specimens received by this Laboratory have a risk of infection, it is believed that these regulations will apply to anybody sending post mortem specimens by post. We have not been informed of a specific date as to when these regulations will be strictly enforced. However, after such a date any package deemed unacceptable by the Royal Mail will be refused delivery. We are carefully monitoring this development and will hopefully be in a position to advise further regarding the exact nature of these implications and address any problems that may arise.

Please contact the Laboratory for further information.

4. LABELLING AND STORAGE OF SAMPLES

All specimen bottles should be clearly labelled with the full name of the deceased, date of collection, the type of specimen and post mortem or reference number. In the case of blood specimens, the specific site of sampling should always be given. All specimens should be stored at 4oC before transporting them to the Laboratory. Each specimen bottle should be securely sealed to prevent leakage, and individually packaged in separate plastic bags to ensure that there is no cross-contamination. Special care is required in the storage of specimens for the analysis of certain poisons - please contact the Laboratory for guidance if unsure.

        Urine specimens

Urine specimens, however small, taken at post mortem are of great value in screening for an unknown drug or poison, particularly substances of abuse. If only a small amount of urine is available, this should be placed in a plain 5mL glass tube. Preferably at least 20mL of urine should be placed in 1-2 plain 20mL sterile plastic container(s). Boric acid containers should NOT be used. Urine is also valuable as a complimentary specimen in the quantitative analysis of alcohol, where there is uncertainty over the validity of a blood specimen. For this purpose, a urine specimen should be placed in a 5mL 1% fluoride/oxalate glass tube.

Importance of site and method of sampling

 The sites and methods of blood sampling are important; care taken at this stage will often be rewarded by more reliable and confident interpretation of toxicological findings. The concentrations of some drugs, notably common compounds such as tricyclic antidepressants and dextropropoxyphene, are much more likely to be “falsely” elevated in blood from thoracic and abdominal vessels than in "peripheral" vessels such as femoral veins. Moreover, even blood from these sites is easily contaminated by blood drawn from contiguous, more central vessels if large specimens are taken without ligation. The procedure recommended below for the collection of femoral venous blood should minimise these effects.

Our current recommendation for an ideal set of blood specimens for toxicological investigations is as follows:

Blood for quantitative analysis 

Blood for quantitative analysis (~ 5mL) should be obtained from two distinct peripheral sites, preferably left and right femoral veins, taken with care so as not to draw a large volume containing blood from more central vessels. The precise sampling site must be indicated on the label. Femoral blood can be taken by cutting the external iliac vein proximal to the inguinal ligament and milking the distal cut end into a plain 20mL sterile plastic container. Approximately 5mL of this blood should be placed in a fluoride/ oxalate tube containing 1% (w/v) sodium fluoride as a preservative.

Blood for qualitative analysis (screening)

        An additional larger specimen of blood (~ 20mL) for qualitative screening should be taken from the heart (preferably right atrium or inferior vena cava) or if necessary from another convenient large vessel. This specimen should be placed in a plain 20mL sterile plastic container. The site of collection must be indicated on the label.

For deaths which have occurred in hospital, the hospital pathology laboratory should be contacted as soon as possible to see if any ante mortem specimens of urine, blood, serum, or plasma are available, and these should also be sent for analysis. The exact date and time of collection should be confirmed and indicated on the submission form. It is also important to note if any antidotes, or drugs used in resuscitation were given and if urine specimens were taken with the use of a catheter and/or lignocaine local anaesthetic.

 Other types of specimen will not normally be required, but they may be valuable in the investigation of certain types of poisoning and should be retained at the mortuary.

All organs should be placed in separate sample containers to remove any chance of cross-contamination. A preservative such as formalin must not be used. Sample containers should be clearly labelled.

 Stomach tissue and contents

 These materials may be useful in the investigation of oral cyanide poisoning, or in cases of rapid death where relatively large amounts of unabsorbed drug may be found in the stomach. In cases of suspected drug overdosage the entire stomach contents should be retained. If distinct tablets or capsules are observed in the stomach contents, these should be carefully extracted, and put in individual containers (e.g. plastic urine containers). Identification of such material can be carried out by reference to a computerised database of pharmaceutical products, or by direct analysis at the Laboratory.

Liver

 This tissue may be useful in certain complex poisoning cases. It is usual to take a portion of the right lobe of liver since it should be uncontaminated with bile and less affected by drug diffusion from the stomach; 100 grams are sufficient for most analytical purposes.

 Brain

A portion of about 100g brain may be useful in the investigation of death due to gases or volatile substances (e.g. butane). The specimen should be placed in a glass specimen jar or nylon bag and deep-frozen prior to transport to the laboratory.

Lung

 A portion of about 100g lung from the apex may be useful in the investigation of death due to gases or volatile substances. The specimen should be placed in a glass specimen jar or nylon bag and stored at 4oC prior to transport to the Laboratory.

 Hair 

Hair specimens may be useful in the investigation of death related to drug abuse (particularly opiates and methadone). Analysis of hair (approximate rate of growth 1 cm per month) is able to provide useful information concerning the chronicity of drug abuse, which is valuable in the interpretation of post mortem drug concentrations. If hair specimens are cut from the head, the proximal end should be clearly identified; the cut end tied with a piece of thread. However, the Laboratory does not currently provide a hair analysis service.

Vitreous Humour

 A sample of vitreous humour is useful where a body has been exposed to heat, or if putrefaction is beginning to occur. This specimen may be especially useful for certain biochemical tests such as urea, creatinine, glucose, lactate and electrolytes; in addition to analysis of alcohols and heroin. More information on the collection of vitreous humour can be found in the recent reviews of Forrest (1993) and Knight (1995, 2002).

Nails and Bone

These specimens may be useful in the investigation of certain types of chronic metal poisoning, notably arsenic and lead.

 

5. ADDITIONAL ADVICE CONCERNING INVESTIGATION OF CERTAIN POISONS

Alcohol (ethanol)

Where there has been evidence of putrefaction or extensive injury to the body or there is a gap of several days between death and post-mortem, it is advisable to take both blood and urine specimens for alcohol analysis. In certain cases it might also be advisable to take a specimen of vitreous humour. Ethanol can sometimes be lost or generated from blood specimens if they have become contaminated by bacteria or fungi. Use of specimen containers containing 2% fluoride is therefore recommended for alcohol measurement in "sensitive" cases.

If should be noted that some enzymic methods for alcohol analysis commonly used by clinical laboratories may give falsely elevated results in critically ill patients or post-mortem specimens. Analysis for alcohol performed by the Regional Toxicology Laboratory is carried out by gas chromatography, which is more specific than enzymic methods of alcohol analysis and is also able to detect the presence of other alcohols such as methanol and isopropanol, or the products of keto-acidosis such as acetone.

Cyanide

In suspected cyanide poisoning it is helpful to collect specimens of blood from more than one peripheral site, and also stomach contents. In cases where the source of cyanide is not known it may be useful to obtain a small specimen of brain (~ 20 grams) from a site deep within the brain to confirm the presence of cyanide.

If there is prolonged storage of blood specimens after post-mortem, it is possible to generate significant quantities of cyanide, probably as a product of bacterial action. The use of blood specimen containers containing 2% sodium fluoride is recommended to prevent this. Blood and tissue specimens are best stored at 4oC and should be analysed as soon a possible after collection. It is important to try to identify the exact source of the cyanide taken by the deceased.

Carbon Monoxide

In cases involving inhalation of vehicle exhaust fumes it is helpful to know the make, year and model of the vehicle concerned. Many modern petrol and diesel cars and other vehicles have catalytic converters, which greatly reduce the amount of carbon monoxide produced. Death from carbon monoxide poisoning may be greatly delayed or impossible in certain circumstances.

Fire deaths

Measurement of both carbon monoxide and cyanide may be helpful in cases involving fires. However, analysis of blood specimens should be carried out without delay. In such cases there is a tendency for the carbon monoxide concentration to decrease with time and the cyanide concentration to increase. Use of blood specimen containers containing 2% sodium fluoride is advisable, particularly in "sensitive" cases or those involving multiple fatalities.

DRUGS & POISONS

Heroin

Heroin is a widely abused drug that is involved in numerous deaths. However, there are difficulties when investigating such deaths. In particular, as heroin (diacetylmorphine) is rapidly metabolised to morphine it can be difficult to distinguish between morphine and heroin overdosage. The first phase metabolite of heroin, 6-monoacetylmorphine (6-MAM), can be used as a "marker" for heroin but it is rapidly metabolised and is unstable in blood. However, recently published literature suggests that this compound may be more stable in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and vitreous humour. Therefore when investigating deaths where heroin is involved/suspected it may be useful to obtain a sample of the vitreous humour in addition to urine specimens and blood specimens from both a "peripheral" and "central" site such as the femoral vein and the heart, respectively.

 Cocaine

 Cocaine is another abused drug which is relatively unstable in blood due to the presence of viable metabolically active enzymes even in post mortem blood. Therefore, it is recommended that in cases where cocaine ingestion is suspected, blood specimens should be placed in fluoride/oxalate tubes containing at least 1% sodium fluoride. It is also advisable to store the specimens at 4oC immediately after collection and before delivery to the Laboratory.

 Nitrazepam

 Published data has shown that the benzodiazepine, nitrazepam is also unstable in blood and therefore traces of nitrazepam may be lost if the blood specimens are not preserved. In order to do this we advise that such blood specimens should be frozen upon collection at post mortem. Specimens should remain frozen prior to delivery to the Laboratory. Generally, in cases of overdosage, nitrazepam can still be detected in the absence of such treatment; however, the concentration will inevitably be lower to some degree making interpretation difficult.

6. BIOCHEMICAL INVESTIGATIONS

Biochemical investigations carried out on post mortem blood are generally of limited value. Biochemical analysis of vitreous humour can sometimes be useful but the interpretation of potassium and sodium concentrations is complex. The presence of acetone and measurement of b-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) in blood and urine may be an indication of alcoholic or diabetic ketoacidosis and can provide useful evidence particularly in sudden alcoholic deaths. The measurement of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) is a much more reliable guide to undiagnosed diabetes mellitus or elevated blood glucose concentrations over a period prior to death and may be performed by hospital clinical chemistry departments. If the injection of an insulin overdose is suspected, post mortem blood and even vitreous humour may not be suitable for subsequent analysis of insulin and C-peptide. Due to the instability of these products and the lack of any comparative data, the interpretation of the findings can be very difficult. Such analyses are not performed at the Regional Laboratory for Toxicology. For cases where lithium may be involved (e.g. the patient had been prescribed lithium), it is also necessary to obtain a serum specimen as the measurement of lithium in post mortem blood can present problems for both analysis and interpretation.

The Laboratory uses a wide range of modern methods to analyse biological specimens for the presence of drugs and poisons. Including:

·         High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)

·         HPLC with UV diode array detection (HPLC-DAD)

·         Gas chromatography (GC)

·         GC with mass spectrometry (GC-MS)

·         Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS)

·         Enzyme Multiplied Immunoassay Technique (EMIT)

·         Fluorescence Polarisation Immunoassay (FPIA)

·         UV Spectrophotometry

·         Radioimmunoassay (RIA)

7. ANALYSIS

If should be noted that some enzymic methods for alcohol analysis commonly used by routine clinical laboratories may give falsely elevated results in critically ill patients or post mortem specimens.  Analysis for alcohol performed by the Regional Laboratory for Toxicology is carried out by gas chromatography, which is more specific than enzymic methods of alcohol analysis and is also able to detect the presence of other alcohols such as methanol and isopropanol, or the products of ketoacidosis such as acetone.

 In the majority of cases, the investigation will be carried out within 10 working days and an interim or final report, including interpretation, will be issued within two weeks. For many uncomplicated cases such as alcohol or carbon monoxide poisoning, a verbal report will generally be available within 24 hours and written report within 5 working days. If there is likely to be a special problem with a particular investigation, e.g. poisoning with recently introduced drugs, the Laboratory will discuss the case with the Coroner's Officer or Pathologist.

8. INTERPRETATION OF FINDINGS

Interpretation of findings can present a problem where there is little background information concerning the case, or where specimen collection has been inadequate. It is difficult to provide any valid comment on the significance of quantitative measurements carried out on a single blood specimen from an unknown site. Interpretation of findings can also be difficult in drug abusers where the likely degree of "tolerance" to a drug is unclear because of inadequate history. In addition, much of the published literature on forensic toxicology relating to so-called "fatal" blood concentrations can be misleading in certain circumstances. It is a common misconception that the concentration of a drug (or poison) found in post mortem blood is equivalent to that obtained in the blood or plasma of the deceased at the time of death.  Interpretation of findings will always need to take account of changes in drug distribution after death. The recent history, age and state of health of the deceased are also important factors to be taken into account in the interpretation of findings. The Laboratory is always happy to discuss individual cases or give further advice on the interpretation of findings.

 

9. DOCUMENTATION

The following documentation is desirable in every case:

·         Details of the deceased, including name, age and date of birth.

·         Relevant medical history, particularly with regard to prescribed medication and whether the deceased suffered from a serious infectious disease such as hepatitis, tuberculosis or AIDS.

·         Circumstances surrounding the death, including date/time of death if known (particularly regarding deaths in hospital).

·         Details of the name and quantity of the substance(s) thought to have caused death.

·         A copy of the Pathologist's preliminary report indicating the likely cause of death.

·         Details of the type of specimens obtained and the specific site of collection.

·         Name, address and telephone number of the Pathologist and Coroner's Officer involved in the case.

·         State HM Coroner's District and name, address and telephone number of HM Coroner (for billing purposes).

 All of the above information is required to enable the Laboratory to provide an accurate interpretation of results and an efficient service.

 Request forms for toxicological analysis are available from the LaboratoryText Box: DOCUMENTATION

10. TRANSPORT OF SPECIMENS

Most specimens, particularly blood and urine, may be sent by post if securely packaged. In certain medico-legal cases, in order to maintain the chain of custody, specimens should ideally be submitted in person to the Laboratory by the authorised Coroner's Officer.

 


 

13. RECOMMENDED READING

 

Knight, B. (1996),

Forensic Pathology

(2nd edition)

Arnold, London.

 

Knight, B. (2002),

The estimation of the time since death in the early postmortem period (2nd edition)

Arnold Publishing, London.

 

Pounder, D.J. and Jones, G.R. (1990),

Post-mortem Drug Redistribution - A Toxicological Nightmare,

Forensic Sci. Int. 45 : 253-363.

 

Forrest, A.R.W. (1993),

Obtaining samples at post-mortem examination for toxicological and biochemical analysis,

J. Clin. Pathol. 46 : 292-296.

 

The Hospital Autopsy (1993),

D.W.K. Cotton & S.S Cross eds.

Butterworth, Heinemann, Oxford.

 

Pounder, D.J. (1993),

The Nightmare of Post-mortem Drug Changes

In: Legal Medicine

Butterworth Legal Publishers, Salem, New Hampshire

pp. 163-191.

 

 

For more information or guidance please contact:

Dr S.P. Elliott, Senior Clinical Scientist, Forensic Toxicology Section Head,

Telephone 0121 507 5204 (Direct line).

E-mail   simon.elliott@swbh.nhs.uk

Fax No. +44 121 507 6021

 

Revised: May 2004


Last edited: May 31, 2007

Back to top

Home